Quote from: alienhand on April 20, 2019, 09:49:19 PM
And, unbeknownst to these anthropological representations of man an unknown substance was in the ground and combined with the dna from the donkey's blood, dna from the bear's sweat and the fly's dna all four of these things mixed together.  Sometime later after the bear leaves the donkey is zombified and bites a person.  The zombie plague spreads like wildfire and both humans and the anthropological representations of man are susceptible to infection.  As most of the population die and become zombified it is a man who organizes the last vestiges of man and non-man into a resistance.  His name was Walkstall and he leads the resistance and slowly but surely they win the zombie war, reestablish civilization, myths and legends develop over 1000s of years and Walkstall slowly changes to "The Walks" and he is defified as a god who went into the fiery pits to slay the demons to free man from their yolk.

Just having fun 

LOL someone's been playing too much Fallout

Quote from: alienhand on April 21, 2019, 08:26:24 AM
I will watch the vid when I get a chance.

Let's say the left's argument about climate change is true.  My question is what do you and others think would be a better approach to take then gov't regulation and intervention and w/o violating the constitution?

It would have to be a free market solution. So assume the lefts bogus climate change is 100% real, well for starters many on the right (who are free thinkers) wld see the facts and get on board as wld most of America. So if everyone accepted climate change then that would have a major effect on national supply and demand. People would first demand a bunch of real scientific studies into what would actually fix it. If it really is the use of fossil fuels (as our little fiction story goes) then the demand for fossil fuels wld dry up and the demand for 'clean' energy wld skyrocket. Money wld flood the market. All the scientists who are interested in money wld turn their efforts to climate change. All the entrepreneurs (who also love money) wld also put their efforts into creating products that help and dont hurt the environment. (U see some of this now as there is some demand for this from leftist fools who believe it). So in the end the brains and might of the American Market wld get behind the problem because consumers wld universally Demand it. But that's all based on the fiction that the left's climate change is real.

Quote from: T Hunt on April 21, 2019, 05:20:32 PM
It would have to be a free market solution. So assume the lefts bogus climate change is 100% real, well for starters many on the right (who are free thinkers) wld see the facts and get on board as wld most of America. So if everyone accepted climate change then that would have a major effect on national supply and demand. People would first demand a bunch of real scientific studies into what would actually fix it. If it really is the use of fossil fuels (as our little fiction story goes) then the demand for fossil fuels wld dry up and the demand for 'clean' energy wld skyrocket. Money wld flood the market. All the scientists who are interested in money wld turn their efforts to climate change. All the entrepreneurs (who also love money) wld also put their efforts into creating products that help and dont hurt the environment. (U see some of this now as there is some demand for this from leftist fools who believe it). So in the end the brains and might of the American Market wld get behind the problem because consumers wld universally Demand it. But that's all based on the fiction that the left's climate change is real.

This is an excellent answer.   I'm sure some great minds would come up with some ingenious and cool stuff.  Your answer is not only provides a solution but expounds upon what certain things mean and goes through steps as to how it would be accomplished.   And, you've given me some insight as to how you and others on here think as well.  In a nutshell, I can't just provide you guys just theories and what-ifs.  And, definetly no emotional appeals as well.  If I want to make a counter-argument to anything I have to

a.  provide something that is concrete and tangible that would provide evidence for the counter-argument.

b.  Don't use yourself and your own personal experiences as examples.

c.  Don't go into what ifs, speculations and abstract theories. 

d.  No emotional appeals.

These are some of the Dos and Don'ts