Conservative Political Forum

Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa, scientists find

By Sarah Knapton, Science Editor, 22 May 2017

The history of human evolution has been rewritten after scientists discovered that Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa.

Currently, most experts believe that our human lineage split from apes around seven million years ago in central Africa, where hominids remained for the next five million years before venturing further afield.

But two fossils of an ape-like creature which had human-like teeth have been found in Bulgaria and Greece, dating to 7.2 million years ago.

The discovery of the creature, named Graecopithecus freybergi, and nicknameded ‘El Graeco' by scientists, proves our ancestors were already starting to evolve in Europe 200,000 years before the earliest African hominid.

More at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/.

That's very interesting 

Yes, I as a Christian also don't believe in Darwinism. This article is to debunk claims that humans originate from Africa. But those hominid apes existed, and it is a question who or what they were. Maybe they were some genetic experiments of some ancient civilizations. Or maybe even God created us like that in the beginning, lol, who knows.

I'm not religious, but I've never bought the leftist Darwinian crap either as proof man and monkey link.
My personal theory, is man sprang to being across the planet at the very same moment in time.
Point being, every time a new discovery is made, suddenly this time we're right, all other theories prior were based on inadequate evidence.

Problem is, we'll never know the truth because man is too arrogant to admit a far more powerful entity was at work, be it god or alien doing God's work.

Old topic, I know, but being fairly ignorant on the subject, I do find it interesting.
Is it possible that at or about the time that man crawled out of the primordial soup, that pairs of different races of humans were systematically planted here on earth? Like a well planned garden, so to speak?
Would this not make both Darwin and the Bible correct?
It has never made any sense to me how there could be, to this day, such a difference in our races.

I think you're correct about man being placed all over the planet simultaneously.
I had my DNA checked, turns out I have a higher percentage of Neanderthal genes in my system than 90% tested, which some believe attributes to red hair, blue eyes etc.
Researchers have noticed true Africans have no known Neandrethal markers coursing through their veins, meaning they remained isolated from the rest of the planet, while others comingled around the globe.

Which raises a question none seem to want to address: Why did the rest of homo sapiens avoid Africa, was Africa regarded as a backward, regressive lot?
Not accusing, just questioning why nature chose the path it did. Truth is, man has always had the drive to return to one's roots, so why do we not find an intermixing of genes if Africa is the, so-called "Home" of humanity?