Conservative Political Forum

General Category => Alternate Boards => Conspiracy Forum => Topic started by: elmerfudd on October 07, 2011, 12:20:43 PM

Title: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: elmerfudd on October 07, 2011, 12:20:43 PM
Elmer's going away for the weekend.  Won't be posting or reading.  Boy will I miss it!  If I get one of the coveted CPF awards, like smartest lib or some such, please hold it for me.  I will definitely be back.  And I will definitely put it on my resume if I am blessed with one of those awards!
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: taxed on October 07, 2011, 12:31:20 PM
No such thing as a smart lib.
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: Solar on October 07, 2011, 12:33:29 PM
Quote from: taxed on October 07, 2011, 12:31:20 PM
No such thing as a smart lib.
:)) :)) :)) :))
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: arpad on October 08, 2011, 05:19:50 AM
Maybe age is catching up with me and I'm getting less patient or my standards are going up but contentless snark is very quickly earning lefties a place on my "don't read" list. If it's clever snark or snark with some worthwhile content that's one thing but the sort of responses elmer's been firing off the last week or so are causing my eyes to glaze over when I see his handle.
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: elmerfudd on October 08, 2011, 07:48:37 AM
Quote from: arpad on October 08, 2011, 05:19:50 AM
Maybe age is catching up with me and I'm getting less patient or my standards are going up but contentless snark is very quickly earning lefties a place on my "don't read" list. If it's clever snark or snark with some worthwhile content that's one thing but the sort of responses elmer's been firing off the last week or so are causing my eyes to glaze over when I see his handle.

My apologies.  I just figured that people who dealt snark as much as CPFers do would be able to take it as well.  Especially when that snark was of lesser quality.  My bad.
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: Solar on October 08, 2011, 09:29:17 AM
Define Snark....
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: arpad on October 08, 2011, 10:38:46 AM
Quote from: elmerfudd on October 08, 2011, 07:48:37 AM
My apologies.  I just figured that people who dealt snark as much as CPFers do would be able to take it as well.  Especially when that snark was of lesser quality.  My bad.
Case in point.
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: Solar on October 08, 2011, 12:13:42 PM
Quote from: arpad on October 08, 2011, 10:38:46 AM
Case in point.
We all know those that can't debate facts, always resort to sarcasm, he is no different...
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: elmerfudd on October 09, 2011, 11:53:56 AM
Quote from: Solar on October 08, 2011, 12:13:42 PM
We all know those that can't debate facts, always resort to sarcasm, he is no different...

Hello pot, meet kettle. 
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: Solar on October 09, 2011, 12:02:48 PM
Quote from: elmerfudd on October 09, 2011, 11:53:56 AM
Hello pot, meet kettle. 
Why not try responding with actual facts to back up your posts, rather than stupid little quips?
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: elmerfudd on October 09, 2011, 12:34:15 PM
Quote from: Solar on October 09, 2011, 12:02:48 PM
Why not try responding with actual facts to back up your posts, rather than stupid little quips?

I think I have.  But since you and others don't like facts that might disagree with your preconceived notions, you attack them.  And me. 
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: Solar on October 09, 2011, 03:36:42 PM
Quote from: elmerfudd on October 09, 2011, 12:34:15 PM
I think I have.  But since you and others don't like facts that might disagree with your preconceived notions, you attack them.  And me. 
No, its when you act like an idiot when I prove you wrong that is the problem.
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: elmerfudd on October 09, 2011, 07:30:07 PM
Quote from: Solar on October 09, 2011, 03:36:42 PM
No, its when you act like an idiot when I prove you wrong that is the problem.

It's your forum. If I am an idiot that won't accept your "inspired" correction, boot me.  I'll live.  I won't re-register, I won't even "lurk" as a guest.  I'll just go away and you can resume the groupthink you apparently like so much. 

Edited to add this: if I find out I am banned next time I try to visit, then let me take this opportunity, in advance, to say I have enjoyed my time here.  Thank you for letting me play as long as you did.  I wish all of you the best.  I don't think things are as black and white as most of you do (there are an awful lot of gray areas, in other words), and I don't think many of the "self evident truths" you folks seem to believe exist really do.  Nor do I think any of you are idiots.  Ciao! 
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: walkstall on October 09, 2011, 08:05:41 PM
Quote from: elmerfudd on October 09, 2011, 07:30:07 PM
It's your forum. If I am an idiot that won't accept your "inspired" correction, boot me.  I'll live.  I won't re-register, I won't even "lurk" as a guest.  I'll just go away and you can resume the groupthink you apparently like so much. 

Edited to add this: if I find out I am banned next time I try to visit, then let me take this opportunity, in advance, to say I have enjoyed my time here.  Thank you for letting me play as long as you did.  I wish all of you the best.  I don't think things are as black and white as most of you do (there are an awful lot of gray areas, in other words), and I don't think many of the "self evident truths" you folks seem to believe exist really do.  Nor do I think any of you are idiots.  Ciao!


What and lose one of the few RINOs we have.
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: Solar on October 09, 2011, 08:57:01 PM
Quote from: elmerfudd on October 09, 2011, 07:30:07 PM
It's your forum. If I am an idiot that won't accept your "inspired" correction, boot me.  I'll live.  I won't re-register, I won't even "lurk" as a guest.  I'll just go away and you can resume the groupthink you apparently like so much. 

Edited to add this: if I find out I am banned next time I try to visit, then let me take this opportunity, in advance, to say I have enjoyed my time here.  Thank you for letting me play as long as you did.  I wish all of you the best.  I don't think things are as black and white as most of you do (there are an awful lot of gray areas, in other words), and I don't think many of the "self evident truths" you folks seem to believe exist really do.  Nor do I think any of you are idiots.  Ciao! 
Every village has its idiot, I see no reason to boot you for misguided ideals.
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: Dan on October 10, 2011, 04:44:46 AM
Fudd, stop being coy. You are a lefty coming to a conservative website to stick your finger in our eye and make provocative statements with little informational value. Trolling.

I did the same thing at politico so I know what it looks like. Just don't try to climb up on a cross because we figured out you only come here to screw with people who do not share your opinions.

If you were here for honest debate then that would be great. But we both know that is not your intention.
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: Dan on October 10, 2011, 04:48:53 AM
No one is going to ban you Fudd. But don't be surprised that people are takimg you less seriously with every post.
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: elmerfudd on October 10, 2011, 07:11:57 AM
Quote from: Dan on October 10, 2011, 04:44:46 AM
Fudd, stop being coy. You are a lefty coming to a conservative website to stick your finger in our eye and make provocative statements with little informational value. Trolling.

I did the same thing at politico so I know what it looks like. Just don't try to climb up on a cross because we figured out you only come here to screw with people who do not share your opinions.

If you were here for honest debate then that would be great. But we both know that is not your intention.

They have little informational value to you because you're too smart.  You already know all sides to everything. 

I am not trolling.  If I were, you'd ban me.  (Well, not you, but those that can.)  That's what I would do to trolls anyway.

It is my intention for honest debate.  But I find that ultra conservatives generally are not interested in that.  And this web-site helps prove that.   
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: walkstall on October 10, 2011, 08:02:32 AM
Quote from: elmerfudd on October 10, 2011, 07:11:57 AM
They have little informational value to you because you're too smart.  You already know all sides to everything. 

I am not trolling.  If I were, you'd ban me.  (Well, not you, but those that can.)  That's what I would do to trolls anyway.

It is my intention for honest debate.  But I find that ultra conservatives generally are not interested in that.  And this web-site helps prove that.



(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsmileys.on-my-web.com%2Frepository%2FSigns%2Fi-love-me-0005.gif&hash=82cefb22ca258a859ebdd3bec423a8a67783baec)
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: Dan on October 10, 2011, 10:51:29 AM
Quote from: elmerfudd on October 10, 2011, 07:11:57 AM
They have little informational value to you because you're too smart.  You already know all sides to everything. 

I am not trolling.  If I were, you'd ban me.  (Well, not you, but those that can.)  That's what I would do to trolls anyway.

It is my intention for honest debate.  But I find that ultra conservatives generally are not interested in that.  And this web-site helps prove that.   

What makes someone an ultra conservative as opposed to an everyday plain old conservative?

Also Solar isn't going to ban you for making unsupported statements from the left. Think about it. You are reinforcing a stereotype here that everyone already thought. Why would he ban that?
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: taxed on October 11, 2011, 09:10:09 AM
Quote from: elmerfudd on October 10, 2011, 07:11:57 AM
They have little informational value to you because you're too smart.  You already know all sides to everything. 

I am not trolling.  If I were, you'd ban me.  (Well, not you, but those that can.)  That's what I would do to trolls anyway.

It is my intention for honest debate.  But I find that ultra conservatives generally are not interested in that.  And this web-site helps prove that.   


Uh oh... who has been disagreeing with Fuddy again??
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: walkstall on October 11, 2011, 07:50:50 PM
Quote from: taxed on October 11, 2011, 09:10:09 AM

Uh oh... who has been disagreeing with Fuddy again??

Young man, I think the list would be shorter by asking who agreeing with Fuddy.  That would save bandwidth.   ;)
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: Dan on October 12, 2011, 10:51:08 AM
Quote from: taxed on October 11, 2011, 09:10:09 AM

Uh oh... who has been disagreeing with Fuddy again??

Guess who has two thumbs and has pissed off fuddy?   :)) :)) :))
Title: Re: Elmer's signing off thread
Post by: quiller on March 11, 2012, 10:44:07 AM
Quote from: Dan on October 10, 2011, 10:51:29 AM

What makes someone an ultra conservative as opposed to an everyday plain old conservative?

Someone who looks at today's Republicans and knows them for the spineless appeasement artists that they are. Someone who believes in gridlock as a GOOD thing, a positive set of brakes on our runaway government.

Someone who knows neither party is any good whatsoever. Someone who also fears any changes to our Constitution, trying to undo the damage already done.