Alexa rankings for top 300 conservative web sites

Started by quiller, August 18, 2015, 06:53:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Solar

Quote from: kit saginaw on August 23, 2015, 05:37:14 AM
I've never been to Grouchy Old Cripple yet.  I am one.  Well, just a busted leg in 2012. 

My point for him is: just list them.  Don't number them according to something.  Otherwise the '300' becomes indulgently fanboy-ish.
Good point. Numbering them creates the illusion of representation of the Conservative movement.
FOX in no way is representative of the Right. Manipulative? Absolutely, but representative...Hardly.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

quiller

Quote from: kit saginaw on August 23, 2015, 05:37:14 AM
I've never been to Grouchy Old Cripple yet.  I am one.  Well, just a busted leg in 2012. 

My point for him is: just list them.  Don't number them according to something.  Otherwise the '300' becomes indulgently fanboy-ish.

I see your point about fanboyishness, but the fact of it is, Alexa counts web-site hits. The higher the number, the higher the ranking.

Here. The site finding entire new realms of anti-PC to play in....

http://grouchyoldcripple.com/

And of course the (extreme language) Loyal Citizens of the Rottweiler realm, over at nicedoggie.....

http://nicedoggie.net/

Solar

Quote from: quiller on August 24, 2015, 03:20:49 AM
I see your point about fanboyishness, but the fact of it is, Alexa counts web-site hits. The higher the number, the higher the ranking.


Exactly my point, Alexa doesn't differentiate between Conservative or liberal hits, that's what the author did with his misplaced bias or pure ignorance of what True Conservatism is.
Where he ever got the idea FOX is a leader in Conservative ideals is beyond reason, or Drudge being a banner carrier for Conservatives, when Drudge proved he is Establishment at best.

The author proves out his own Establishment bias in putting Establishment sites in the lead over true Conservative sites.

One other point in all of this, the Establishment is attempting to usurp the term Conservative as a way of weakening TEA, and they're increasing their assault weekly.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

kit saginaw

Whistling past the TEA graveyard...  Yeah, I'm getting tired of that attitude by some 'right-wing' news sites who think we just pop-up at election-time.  And in-between, we're 'dead' or 'fading'

FOX didn't mention TEA during their debate.  We're the 'conservative-base'...  d'uh.

btw, great-looking websites, Q.


quiller

Quote from: kit saginaw on August 24, 2015, 08:46:16 PM
Whistling past the TEA graveyard...  Yeah, I'm getting tired of that attitude by some 'right-wing' news sites who think we just pop-up at election-time.  And in-between, we're 'dead' or 'fading'

FOX didn't mention TEA during their debate.  We're the 'conservative-base'...  d'uh.

btw, great-looking websites, Q.

Your life will never under any circumstances whatsoever be the same after you acquire the habit of Saturday morning posts at GOC. (Toejam's contributions to Saturday Morning Boobage, for example, or the comments in the rock music features).
.
.
.
.
.

Well, maybe I overstate just a little, but.....   :wink:  :biggrin:

quiller

Quote from: Solar on August 24, 2015, 06:40:25 AM
Exactly my point, Alexa doesn't differentiate between Conservative or liberal hits, that's what the author did with his misplaced bias or pure ignorance of what True Conservatism is.
Where he ever got the idea FOX is a leader in Conservative ideals is beyond reason, or Drudge being a banner carrier for Conservatives, when Drudge proved he is Establishment at best.

The author proves out his own Establishment bias in putting Establishment sites in the lead over true Conservative sites.

One other point in all of this, the Establishment is attempting to usurp the term Conservative as a way of weakening TEA, and they're increasing their assault weekly.

Let's see....

Among all the TV outlets Fox is the one with the highest percentage of stories of interest to conservatives. (And no I am not saying it is a conservative channel, just closer to being balanced than the others.)

Since the majority of viewers DO NOT get their product by over-the-air broadcast but instead by MEASURABLE CABLE TV HITS, then Fox gets the largest number of hits.

If anything this list attempts to inflate the conservative presence by listing the in-betweener sites with mixed content.


Solar

Quote from: quiller on August 25, 2015, 02:23:02 AM
Let's see....

Among all the TV outlets Fox is the one with the highest percentage of stories of interest to conservatives. (And no I am not saying it is a conservative channel, just closer to being balanced than the others.)

Since the majority of viewers DO NOT get their product by over-the-air broadcast but instead by MEASURABLE CABLE TV HITS, then Fox gets the largest number of hits.

If anything this list attempts to inflate the conservative presence by listing the in-betweener sites with mixed content.
And Manson wasn't as brutal as Dahmer. What's your point?
Murdoch is a lib that leans RINO, his news production has a serious left slant/agenda, he tapped an untapped mkt, majority America, just not as Marxist as the networks, disguised by right leaning talking head pundits.

FOX Is Not Conservative, Not One Tiny Bit! On a lateral scale 1 to 10, and 10 being Conservative, FOX crawls up to a weak 3.
Sorry, the author is an idiot. With that said, he did link to some pretty good sites, which gives me an idea, we need to make a list of our own.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

quiller

Quote from: Solar on August 25, 2015, 06:11:55 AM
And Manson wasn't as brutal as Dahmer. What's your point?
Murdoch is a lib that leans RINO, his news production has a serious left slant/agenda, he tapped an untapped mkt, majority America, just not as Marxist as the networks, disguised by right leaning talking head pundits.

FOX Is Not Conservative, Not One Tiny Bit! On a lateral scale 1 to 10, and 10 being Conservative, FOX crawls up to a weak 3.
Sorry, the author is an idiot. With that said, he did link to some pretty good sites, which gives me an idea, we need to make a list of our own.

I disagree with that 3 rating but it's your opinion and site here so I will just shrug and stumble forward.  :ttoung:

Rupert's sons now run the empire and they ARE more liberal than Daddio, but that "untapped market" was out there all along...and although it was NEVER perfect, Fox was in fact at least a PRETENSE at a conservative point of view. And that was a rarity that the leftard lamestream media cannot and will not endure.

Which sites do you think deserve attempts to obtain reciprocal links, to help raise CPF profile?

Solar

Quote from: quiller on August 25, 2015, 06:30:59 AM
I disagree with that 3 rating but it's your opinion and site here so I will just shrug and stumble forward.  :ttoung:

Rupert's sons now run the empire and they ARE more liberal than Daddio, but that "untapped market" was out there all along...and although it was NEVER perfect, Fox was in fact at least a PRETENSE at a conservative point of view. And that was a rarity that the leftard lamestream media cannot and will not endure.

Which sites do you think deserve attempts to obtain reciprocal links, to help raise CPF profile?
Amazingly, we really don't need the help anymore, we stand atop of all other forums so called Conservative forums, we are the standard bearer for TEA forums, the go to site for defining what TEA is, what true Conservatives think, there is none better.

We achieved this status in only 4 short years, and some of the credit goes to Google, believe it or not.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Solar

Quote from: quiller on August 25, 2015, 06:30:59 AM
I disagree with that 3 rating but it's your opinion and site here so I will just shrug and stumble forward.  :ttoung:

Rupert's sons now run the empire and they ARE more liberal than Daddio, but that "untapped market" was out there all along...and although it was NEVER perfect, Fox was in fact at least a PRETENSE at a conservative point of view. And that was a rarity that the leftard lamestream media cannot and will not endure.

Which sites do you think deserve attempts to obtain reciprocal links, to help raise CPF profile?
Oh, and that 3 rating? One has to step back and view it with an open, yet critical eye.
What you don't see, is by far more important that what you do see on FOX.
Omitting the truth, well...that's still as bad as a lie, which is what FOX is notorious for, not covering truly important events, or giving them minimal air time.
The best way to test this, is to know the details of a story going in, and watch how they manipulate the info, in highlighting certain aspects, while downplaying others not conducive to the Establishments agenda.

One other trick is to turn down the sound and watch the images, how they repeat a 5 second scene over and over and over again, beating an emotion into your head, creating a locked emotional response.

I never really have been a viewer of any TV news, including FOX.
I hate being played for a fool/tool, I don't need any help forming my opinions as a Solid Conservative, I heave a clear understanding of Right and wrong, and don't need some editor with an agenda tugging at my heartstrings to sway my opinion based on emotion.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

quiller

Quote from: Solar on August 25, 2015, 06:46:56 AM
Amazingly, we really don't need the help anymore, we stand atop of all other forums so called Conservative forums, we are the standard bearer for TEA forums, the go to site for defining what TEA is, what true Conservatives think, there is none better.

We achieved this status in only 4 short years, and some of the credit goes to Google, believe it or not.
Well, you mentioned that there WERE some sites worth bringing to folks's attention here. What are they, in your view? As for reciprocated links, what better way to raise your number of individual visitors, in addition to or merely as a supplement of any rating service?

Solar

Quote from: quiller on August 25, 2015, 09:00:25 AM
Well, you mentioned that there WERE some sites worth bringing to folks's attention here. What are they, in your view? As for reciprocated links, what better way to raise your number of individual visitors, in addition to or merely as a supplement of any rating service?
For starters, you have to go down the lsit a bit, past a whole list of what I consider leftist site, to get to the first one, http://allenbwest.com/, then you get http://freebeacon.com/, not bad, http://cnsnews.com/ which has it's moments, to, http://wattsupwiththat.com/ a great site, but topic specific.
And this is in no particular order, I just went down the list.

Take Realclear politics, the site claims no affiliation, yet if you actually study the site you see the leftist bias.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!