Quote from: taxed on February 07, 2014, 02:15:37 PM
http://www.mprnews.org/story/2012/08/09/education/new-lunch-menu
http://www.nccivitas.org/2012/state-inspectors-searching-childrens-lunch-boxes-this-isnt-china-is-it/
http://www.nhregister.com/general-news/20120331/feds-to-require-students-to-buy-fruit-vegetables-with-school-cafeteria-lunches
http://articles.mcall.com/2012-09-18/news/mc-new-lunch-rules-fruits-vegetables-20120912_1_school-lunches-fruits-hunger-free-kids-act

Yeah.  What a crazy man.

Every single one of those stories deals with government school lunches. Nothing about the government "calling your home to see if you ate your vegetables."

Quote from: JRP1990 on February 07, 2014, 02:26:53 PM
Every single one of those stories deals with government school lunches. Nothing about the government "calling your home to see if you ate your vegetables."

So you're saying Broun is paranoid that government is getting too big and like big brother?

Quote from: taxed on February 07, 2014, 02:29:12 PM
So you're saying Broun is paranoid that government is getting too big and like big brother?

I don't want to say that, because I think that government *IS* getting too Orwellian. Too much like Big Brother. But do I think Broun is fear-mongering here? Yes.

Quote from: JRP1990 on February 07, 2014, 02:33:34 PM
I don't want to say that, because I think that government *IS* getting too Orwellian. Too much like Big Brother. But do I think Broun is fear-mongering here? Yes.

So Broun thinks government is getting too big and over regulating?  Then perfect.  I can't wait until November to vote for him.

Quote from: taxed on February 07, 2014, 02:36:57 PM
So Broun thinks government is getting too big and over regulating?  Then perfect.  I can't wait until November to vote for him.

That's the beauty of our American Republic. You can make your choice, I can make mine, and we can discuss the differences in a civil and respectful manner.

I happen to be of the opinion that Broun's tendency for exaggeration, and his ridiculous views on science, would make him an embarrassment to the state of Georgia. Which is sad, because he's really got a good voting record (very close to Ron Paul's).

Quote from: JRP1990 on February 07, 2014, 02:47:10 PM
That's the beauty of our American Republic. You can make your choice, I can make mine, and we can discuss the differences in a civil and respectful manner.

I happen to be of the opinion that Broun's tendency for exaggeration, and his ridiculous views on science, would make him an embarrassment to the state of Georgia. Which is sad, because he's really got a good voting record (very close to Ron Paul's).

Like what?  Does he believe in man made global warming, or higher taxes are good for the economy or something stupid like that?

Quote from: taxed on February 07, 2014, 02:52:59 PM
Like what?  Does he believe in man made global warming, or higher taxes are good for the economy or something stupid like that?

That's not the problem. The problem is that he believes the Earth is 6,000 years old, and created, in its entirety, in a 144 hour period.

Quote from: JRP1990 on February 07, 2014, 02:58:34 PM
That's not the problem. The problem is that he believes the Earth is 6,000 years old, and created, in its entirety, in a 144 hour period.

Democrats believe man causes global warming, and while it's getting cold.

Quote from: JRP1990 on February 07, 2014, 02:58:34 PM
That's not the problem. The problem is that he believes the Earth is 6,000 years old, and created, in its entirety, in a 144 hour period.

So you have no problem with govt killing industry or dictating what you're allowed to buy, yet you take issue with someones faith?
Does the term "Hypocritical Bigot" mean anything to you?

Quote from: Solar on February 07, 2014, 03:50:38 PM
So you have no problem with govt killing industry or dictating what you're allowed to buy, yet you take issue with someones faith?
Does the term "Hypocritical Bigot" mean anything to you?

Amazing.  Broun would reduce government, and not let his religious beliefs put is more in debt.  Nunn will be a lock-and-step with the communist green agenda.

Quote from: taxed on February 07, 2014, 03:53:04 PM
Amazing.  Broun would reduce government, and not let his religious beliefs put is more in debt.  Nunn will be a lock-and-step with the communist green agenda.

But Nunn's OK, since he's a godless Lib. Freakin amazing isn't it?

Quote from: Solar on February 07, 2014, 03:55:21 PM
But Nunn's OK, since he's a godless Lib. Freakin amazing isn't it?

These anti-God zealots are not thinkers.  They don't think about nature or life.  They don't respect nature.  Well, they respect nature the same way a lib cares about wild animals by trying to feed them.  They make fun of someone like Broun, a doctor, saying he is anti-science.  How stupid is that?

Quote from: JRP1990 on February 07, 2014, 02:58:34 PM
That's not the problem. The problem is that he believes the Earth is 6,000 years old, and created, in its entirety, in a 144 hour period.

Hell if that is all that wrong with him, I would even vote for him. 

Quote from: taxed on February 07, 2014, 04:03:14 PM
These anti-God zealots are not thinkers.  They don't think about nature or life.  They don't respect nature.  Well, they respect nature the same way a lib cares about wild animals by trying to feed them.  They make fun of someone like Broun, a doctor, saying he is anti-science.  How stupid is that?

We need to have a lib appreciation day by celebrating anthropomorphic Earth, where libs can get in touch with their gentler side and connect with the human side of natures wildlife..
We can have cruises taking them out to pet and feed sharks, after all, sharks are simply misunderstood creatures, or up close and personal with Polar bears, and if that's too cold, there's always the mt lion petting zoo.

Hey, it's nothing that a big hug won't cure.....

Unsubstantiated and false assumptions made in the past hour:

1) My disagreement with Broun's views on evolution/Earth age make me a godless liberal. I am a Christian who believes in science, and have a problem with my Senator being a man who cannot rationally process and accept scientific fact because it clashes with his personal beliefs.

2) My disagreement with Broun automatically means that I support Nunn. This one is laughable. Nunn has not proven herself qualified to be a US Senator, and I already have a candidate in the GOP primary that I support.

3) My disagreement with Broun's views on science means that I don't have a problem with big government. Talk about a non-sequiter.



Keep them coming, guys! If you keep going, you can paint me as a Trotskyist.